{"id":1697,"date":"2016-03-16T15:34:57","date_gmt":"2016-03-16T15:34:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/?p=1697"},"modified":"2016-04-02T00:10:40","modified_gmt":"2016-04-01T23:10:40","slug":"programme-china-and-the-great-war-a-symposium","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/?p=1697","title":{"rendered":"Programme and Speakers for China and the Great War Symposium"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_1673\" style=\"width: 480px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/CHINA-AND-THE-GREAT-WAR.png\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1673\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1673\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-1673\" src=\"https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/CHINA-AND-THE-GREAT-WAR-470x378.png\" alt=\"Students demonstrate in Beijing in protest of the decision at the Paris Peace Conference to award former German concessions in China to Japan. 4 May, 1919.\" width=\"470\" height=\"378\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/CHINA-AND-THE-GREAT-WAR-470x378.png 470w, https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/CHINA-AND-THE-GREAT-WAR-24x19.png 24w, https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/CHINA-AND-THE-GREAT-WAR-36x29.png 36w, https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/CHINA-AND-THE-GREAT-WAR-48x39.png 48w, https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/CHINA-AND-THE-GREAT-WAR.png 544w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 470px) 100vw, 470px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1673\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Students demonstrate in Beijing in protest of the decision at the Paris Peace Conference to award former German concessions in China to Japan. 4 May, 1919.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>This event is free but booking is essential. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.eventbrite.co.uk\/e\/china-and-the-great-war-a-symposium-tickets-22263581973\" target=\"_blank\">Tickets are available here.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>9.15 Anne Witchard (University of Westminster)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Coffee and Introduction<\/p>\n<p>Anne Witchard is Senior Lecturer in the Dept. of English, Linguistics and Cultural Studies at the University of Westminster. She recently published England\u2019s Yellow Peril: Sinophobia and the Great War (Penguin 2015)<\/p>\n<p><strong>9.45 Paul J Bailey (University of Durham)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u2018From \u201cCoolie\u201d to \u201cTransnational Agent\u201d: Contemporary Chinese Discourses on Chinese Contract Workers in WW1 France\u2019<\/p>\n<p>Abstract:<\/p>\n<p>During World War One nearly 150,000 Chinese labourers were recruited by the British and French governments to carry out war-related work near the western front and throughout France. For a long time the role played by these workers was largely forgotten in both western and Chinese historiography, the result of an overtly Eurocentric approach to World War One in the former case, and the tendency in the latter case to view the recruitment as simply another example of China\u2019s exploitation by nefarious western imperialism. The talk will analyse the reasons why in recent years the World War One Chinese workers have been \u2018rediscovered\u2019 in official and academic Chinese discourse, suggesting that their contribution to the allied victory is now celebrated and valorised as an example of China\u2019s positive engagement with the world and commitment to world peace. In a wider context, such valorisation also dovetails with contemporary discourse in China that describes Chinese labour export since the 1990s very much in terms of a selfless contribution to \u2018civilised\u2019 and modern development. This grandiose and often overblown rhetoric concerning the active and beneficial nature of China\u2019s historical and contemporary global interactions represents the flip-side to China\u2019s other ubiquitous view of its historical interaction with the West that emphasises \u2018national humiliation\u2019 (guochi). The talk concludes that amidst the contemporary celebration of the World War One Chinese workers significant aspects of the episode are overlooked, in particular how it represented a significant change in Chinese official attitudes towards overseas Chinese labour, and why it constitutes an important chapter in modern China\u2019s labour history.<\/p>\n<p>Paul Bailey is Professor of Modern Chinese History at University of Durham<\/p>\n<p><strong>10.30 Mariusz Gasior (Imperial War Museum)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u2018The Chinese Labour Corps on the Western Front 1916-1918: A photographic presentation\u2019<\/p>\n<p>For the last three years Mariusz Gasior has been responsible for cataloguing the IWM\u2019s main First World War photographic collections \u2013 so called Q Series \u2013 part of which is the material held by the museum relating to Britain\u2019s Chinese Labour Corps.<\/p>\n<p>11.15 Coffee<\/p>\n<p><strong>11.30 Xu Guoqi (Hong Kong University)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u2018The Great War and the Question of \u201cwhat is China\u201d\u2018<\/p>\n<p>Abstract:<\/p>\n<p>This paper examines the following questions: how did Chinese seize the moment of the Great War to address the question \u201cwhat is China\u201d by seeking to join the family of nations as an equal member? How did the major powers provide different answers with their secret treaties and their decisions to block China\u2019s dream at the post-war peace conference? And how did Chinese try to seek answers to question \u201cwhat was China\u201d through so-called \u201cthird civilization?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Xu Guoqi, currently professor of history at the Hong Kong University, received his PhD in history from Harvard University. He is author of the following recent books: Asia and the Great War: a Shared History (Oxford University Press, forthcoming); Chinese and Americans: a Shared History (Harvard University Press, 2014); Strangers at the Western Front: Chinese Workers in the Great War (Harvard University Press, 2011); Olympic Dreams: China and Sports, 1895-2008 (Harvard University Press, 2008), China and the Great War (Cambridge University Press, 2005). He is now working on a book What is China: a shared and transnational history.<\/p>\n<p>12.30-1.15 Lunch provided with film screening from Steve Lau and Ensuring We Remember\u2013 the National Campaign for a Permanent Memorial to the Chinese Labour Corps of the First World War.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1.15 Elisabeth Forster (University of Oxford China Centre)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u2018Roundabout implications of WWI: The role of newspapers in the making of the New Culture Movement\u2019<\/p>\n<p>Abstract:<\/p>\n<p>The year 1919 in China was not only the year of the Treaty of Versailles. It was also the year of the protests against it (May Fourth) and the invention of the idea that there was a \u2018New Culture Movement\u2019 in China. The latter led to the popularisation of important ideas, among them Marxism and the rise of \u2018plain language\u2019 (baihua), a precursor of the modern Chinese language. This paper argues that the cultural side of this (i.e. the New Culture Movement) only happened because unexpected side effects of newspaper coverage connected it to the politics of the year (May Fourth, Versailles).<\/p>\n<p>Newspapers had, in early 1919, reported about academic debates at the prestigious Beijing University in a way that made one group of academics around the scholars Hu Shi and Chen Duxiu appear as if they were victims of the Chinese government. These academics had endorsed ideas like Marxism and \u2018plain language\u2019. When students demonstrated against the Treaty of Versailles starting from 4 May 1919, these students were depicted by newspapers as government victims too. The academics at Beijing University were therefore soon identified with the May Fourth demonstrations, although they did not have more to do with the protests than other academic groups. Much to the surprise of contemporaries, not least of the newspapers themselves, these academics and their ideas soon became popular among a May Fourth-sympathetic public, and China\u2019s culture turned towards Marxism and \u2018plain language\u2019.<\/p>\n<p>This shows how much coincidence was involved in making the particular brand of modernity that we find in China today. It also argues against an understanding of New Culture and May Fourth which claims that the two were linked through Confucian notions about the connectedness of culture and politics, or that the advocates of Marxism and \u2018plain language\u2019 were also key figures in the protests of May Fourth against Versailles.<\/p>\n<p>Elisabeth Forster is Departmental Lecturer in Modern Chinese History at Oxford University\u2019s China Centre. She has published \u2018From Academic Nitpicking to a \u201cNew Culture Movement\u201d: How Newspapers Turned Academic Debates into the Center of \u201cMay Fourth\u201d\u2018, Frontiers of History in China, vol. 9, no. 4, 2014: 534-557, (Together with Jan Knoerich), \u2018Cross-Taiwan Strait Relations in an Era of Technological Change: Introduction\u2019, in Paul Irwin Crookes and Jan Knoerich (eds.), Cross-Taiwan Strait Relations in an Era of Technological Change: Security, Economic and Cultural Dimensions (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) (2015) and \u2018The buzzword \u201cNew Culture Movement\u201d: Intellectual Marketing Strategies in China in 1919\u2019, Modern Asian Studies (forthcoming).<\/p>\n<p><strong>2.00 Laura Spinney<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u2018Did the Spanish flu start in China?\u2019<\/p>\n<p>Abstract:<\/p>\n<p>The Spanish flu (1918-1920) killed between 50 and 100 million people worldwide, but its origins are wreathed in mystery. We know only that it didn\u2019t start in Spain, but that Spain took the blame because, being neutral in the Great War, it didn\u2019t censor its newspapers and so was the first country in Europe to publicly report cases within its borders. There are three current theories of where the pandemic began, corresponding to origins in France, the US and China. A Chinese origin was first proposed in the years immediately following the pandemic, but has recently enjoyed a revival. I will present the three theories, laying out the historical and scientific case for each. Finally I will describe new scientific research involving \u201cmolecular clocks\u201d, that indicates that one of the three theories is far more likely than the other two.<\/p>\n<p>Laura Spinney is a science journalist and author. Her writing on science has appeared in Nature, The Economist, The Guardian and National Geographic, among others. She is the author of two novels, an oral history of a European city and an upcoming \u201cbiography\u201d of the Spanish flu, to be published by Jonathan Cape in the spring of 2017. Born in the UK, she currently lives in Paris.<\/p>\n<p>2.45 Tea<\/p>\n<p><strong>3.00 Xiaolu Guo<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Coolies<\/p>\n<p>Abstract:<\/p>\n<p>Xiaolu Guo contributed an essay \u2018Coolies\u2019 for Goodbye to All That, a series of radio broadcasts co-commissioned by 14-18 Now-WW1 Centenary Arts Commissions the official cultural programme for the First World War Centenary commemorations hosted within the Imperial War Museums. Taking Robert Graves\u2019 phrase as the starting point, Guo contemplates the role of Chinese \u2018coolies\u2019 on the battlefields of the First World War.<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/www.1418now.org.uk\/commissions\/goodbye-to-all-that\/essays\/coolies\/<\/p>\n<p>Novelist and film-maker, Xiaolu Guo studied at the Beijing Film Academy and received her MA from the National Film School in London. Her novels have been translated into more than 26 languages. Her novel A Concise Chinese-English Dictionary For Lovers (2008) was shortlisted for the Orange Prize for Fiction and in 2013 she was named as one of Granta\u2018s Best of Young British Novelists, a list drawn up once a decade. Her award-winning films include, She, a Chinese and Once Upon a Time Proletarian. Her latest novel is I Am China. Guo currently lives in London and was a guest of the DAAD Artists in Residence in Berlin in 2012 and a Writer in Residence of the Literaturhaus Zurich and the PWG Foundation in Zurich in 2015.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3.30 Gregory James<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Towards a determination of the extent of the Chinese casualties in Allied service during the First World War<\/p>\n<p>Abstract:<\/p>\n<p>An issue often discussed in the literature is that of how many Chinese died in Allied service during the First World War. Estimates vary between 2,000 (approximately the number of Chinese Labour Corps graves in Commonwealth War Graves Commission cemeteries in northern Europe) and an unsubstantiated 34,000 \u201cdead or missing\u201d CLC labourers, in a recent Chinese article. Even during the con\ufb02ict, the Central Powers diffused propagandist rumours of hefty losses among the labourers; already in February 1918, for example, they alleged 13,000 fatalities: \u201cThe wildness of the story is almost without parallel,\u201d harrumphed the North-China Herald in response. The CWGC graves certainly do not represent the total number of CLC deaths, and recent research has unearthed the names of several labourers known to have died in service but who have no memorial. Moreover, the total Chinese sacrifice has also to take account of personnel in the Chinese Porter Corps, the Royal Navy, the Mercantile Marine and Inland Water Transport, as well as in French units, in Europe, Africa and the Middle East. The recent availability of previously inaccessible records has allowed a tentative establishment of evidence-based statistics of the extent of the Chinese casualties in Allied service during the war.<\/p>\n<p>Gregory James, a graduate of the Universities of Edinburgh (MA) and Exeter (PhD), and a Fellow of the Royal Historical Society, is a former Senior Lecturer in the University of Exeter. He also held academic posts in China, India and Iran, and now lives in retirement in Hong Kong. His monograph on the creation, management and operation of the Chinese Labour Corps (The Chinese Labour Corps (1916\u20131920); Hong Kong, 2013) is the leading reference on the topic.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4.15 Daniel York Loh<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u2018the forgotten of the forgotten\u2019<\/p>\n<p>Abstract:<\/p>\n<p>Daniel York Loh will discuss his new play, forgotten of the forgotten based on the untold and hidden stories of the World War One Chinese Labour Corps who worked behind the lines assisting the allied war effort. Produced by Gemma Lloyd and developed at Theatre Royal Stratford East.<\/p>\n<p>Daniel York Loh is a writer, actor and filmmaker who, along with Jennifer Lim, is co-artistic director of Moongate Productions. As an actor his theatre work includes the Royal Shakespeare Company, Royal Court and National Theatre as well as in the feature films Rogue Trader and The Beach. Most recently he was in Welcome Home, Captain Fox! at the Donmar Warehouse and in the BBC Radio 4 dramatisation of The Inspector Chen Mysteries. He is a graduate of both the Royal Court\u2019s Studio playwrights\u2019 group and the Orange Tree writers\u2019 collective. His first full-length stage play The Fu Manchu Complex was produced by Moongate at the Ovalhouse in 2013 and he has had several short plays staged at venues such as The Bush, Theatre Royal Stratford East, the Orange Tree and the Royal Court. His short film, Mercutio\u2019s Dreaming: The Killing of a Chinese Actor, was nominated for four awards at the World Independent Music &amp; Film Festival and he recently wrote the script for another short film, Dream Of Emerald Hill, produced by Moongate, which is currently playing at international film festivals. With composer Craig Adams he recently won the 2016 Perfect Pitch award to create an original musical theatre piece based on events around the 2004 Morecambe Bay cockle picker disaster.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; This event is free but booking is essential. Tickets are available here. 9.15 Anne Witchard (University of Westminster) Coffee and Introduction Anne Witchard is Senior Lecturer in the Dept. of English, Linguistics and Cultural Studies at the University of Westminster. She recently published England\u2019s Yellow Peril: Sinophobia and the Great War (Penguin 2015) 9.45 &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"moree\"><a class=\"more\" href=\"https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/?p=1697\">Read more <i class=\"fa fa-arrow-circle-right\"><\/i><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1697","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-clc-related-events"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1697","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1697"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1697\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1721,"href":"https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1697\/revisions\/1721"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1697"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1697"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ensuringweremember.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1697"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}